VitaFusions is a mobile infusion service rather than a shipped programme, and it answers the pharmacy question with a company name and a phone number. Its price list prints every figure twice, and only one of the two is live.
What VitaFusions IV charges
NAD+: $159 — a per-session price for one mobile infusion, read as "NAD+ - $159 $195 — Our most popular anti-aging treatment to support brain health and mental clarity" where the second figure computes text-decoration line-through and the first does not; the page is headed "Mobile IV Packages & Pricing" and every card ends in "Book Now", so no billing period exists and nothing recurs. ⛔ A separate package, "NaD+ Boost - $299 $350", combines this compound with a vitamin blend and is NOT recorded as a second row, because a combination figure is not this compound's price
VitaFusions IV is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
The pharmacy question, answered by name
The last question on the FAQ page asks where the medication comes from. The answer is a company name and a telephone number. That is the whole answer and it is more than most of this market gives.
Around it, the same page says what qualification the person administering an infusion holds, how long a session takes, what is already included in the quoted price, and that infusion therapy is not a substitute for medical treatment.
None of that is marketing. It is the set of facts a person needs before letting somebody put a line in their arm in their own living room, and it is written plainly.
It is also, unusually for this roster, a service whose supplier can be checked independently rather than described by regulatory category.
Every price is printed twice and one is dead
The package list shows each treatment followed by two figures with no label between them. Nothing on the page says which is current.
The answer is in the styling, not the text: on all six packages the second figure carries a strikethrough and the first does not. That distinction was read off the rendered page rather than assumed from the order.
It matters because a strikethrough does not survive a text extraction. Any process that reads this page as plain text sees a pair of numbers and has a fifty-fifty chance of recording the crossed-out one, which on this page is the higher of the two every time.
This record takes the undecorated figure and says on the row how it was determined, so a later re-read does not have to guess.
A session, not a subscription, and one metropolitan area
This is a per-visit price. The page is headed as a package and pricing list, every card ends in a booking control, and the FAQ describes a session of thirty to sixty minutes. Nothing recurs and no billing period exists.
Comparing that figure against a monthly programme rate elsewhere on this site would be comparing a single appointment against a month of medication, so the row is filed as not monthly and says why.
The operating entity carries a state in its name, booking is a single local telephone number, and the model is a practitioner travelling to the client. No coverage claim appears anywhere, so this record carries no states.
One further caveat: a shop section on the same domain is headed for research compounds and marked not for human or veterinary consumption. It lists no product today, but the heading is on the site and readers should know it is there.
Who it's for
Readers in one metropolitan area who want an infusion at home rather than a shipped vial.
Buyers who want the compounding pharmacy named and contactable before they book.
Anyone who wants travel fees and taxes stated as already included.
Shoppers comparing a single session against a monthly programme with their eyes open about the difference.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone outside the service area, which the site never defines.
Buyers looking for an ongoing programme rather than an appointment.
Readers who need lab work included.
Anyone uncomfortable that the same domain carries a research-compound section marked not for human consumption.
Strengths
Names the pharmacy that makes its medication, with a telephone number, in a plain FAQ answer
Prints a full package price list on one page rather than behind a booking flow
States that travel fees and taxes are already inside the quoted price
Says what qualification the person administering the infusion holds
Says plainly that infusion therapy is not a substitute for medical treatment
Trade-offs
Every package price is printed as an undated pair with the dead figure unlabelled, so a text-only reading can pick the wrong one
A regional mobile service with one booking telephone number and no coverage claim anywhere
A shop section on the same domain is headed for research compounds and marked not for human or veterinary consumption, though it lists no product
The compound is also sold as a combination package whose higher figure buys a vitamin blend as well, which invites a false comparison
No lab work is included in or priced beside any package
An age interstitial covers every page before any content is reachable
How we verified this
Rendered every page in a real browser and read only laid-out, visible text nodes.
Fired two nonsense paths at the host in the same session before the real pages; both returned an honest not-found response.
Read the computed text-decoration of every price element on the rendered page to determine which of each pair is live, rather than inferring it from the order they appear in.
Filed the figure as a per-session price because the page heading, the booking controls and the FAQ session length all say it is one, and no billing period appears anywhere.
Declined to record the combination package as a second row for the same compound, because its higher figure also buys a vitamin blend.
Read the pharmacy answer at the very bottom of the FAQ, which is the last item on the page and easy to truncate away.
Screened the operating company, the brand and the named pharmacy against the regulator's live warning-letter index, with a known-positive query and a nonsense query in the same run.
Recorded the research-compound shop section as read, including that it currently lists no product.
A provider to compare VitaFusions IV against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.