Provider review, September 2026
WellMedr publishes one figure for one compound and repeats it three times with the unit attached, which is more consistency than most sellers here manage. The second set of figures on the same page is the grey market's, printed to be compared against, and recording those as this seller's would be exactly backwards.
WellMedr is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
The same figure appears in the page header, in a comparison table and in an answer to its own pricing question.
Two of the three carry a month marker, and the answer adds that the price is the same at every dose and includes the online consultation.
Repeating a figure consistently across three surfaces is a small thing that makes it much easier to trust.
This row records it as a monthly rate because the seller says so in words, not because the layout implied it.
A comparison table on the same page sets this seller against unsupervised online sellers and prints a price range for those.
That range is lower than this seller's own figure, and it is labelled with a warning rather than an offer.
A parser taking the lowest figure on the page would publish the grey market's range as this seller's price.
The same table also uses the absence of third-party testing as a criticism of that market — which is a criticism, not a claim about this seller's own product.
One figure is published for the single compound named, repeated three times on one page with a month marker and an explicit statement that it does not change with dose.
On documentation the finding is more specific: not claimed for its own product; the page uses third-party testing as a criticism of the market it compares itself against.
One hundred and thirty-seven of the two hundred and ten sellers here publish a figure somewhere on their own site, and this is one of them.
The host itself was checked in the same pass as everything above: 404 at a nonsense path, same effective path, which is what any absence recorded here rests on.
One hundred and seventy-six of the two hundred and ten sellers here publish no state list at all, and this is one of them, so eligibility is settled inside an intake rather than before one.
Sixteen of the two hundred and ten sellers here name the facility that fills an order; this is one of the one hundred and ninety-four that do not, so there is no facility a reader can look up.
Four of the two hundred and ten sellers here describe lab work as included in what they charge, and this is not one of them.
It declares one of the sixteen compounds this site tracks, which puts it with the twenty-nine single-compound sellers here — anything else in this comparison has to be bought somewhere else.
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
Read the full Trellis Vitality review
Trellis Vitality is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
Visit Trellis VitalityYes. The seller prints it with a month marker and separately answers its own pricing question by saying it is a monthly rate that includes the online consultation.
The seller says it does not, and it names a dose range covered by the same figure.
A range attributed to unsupervised online sellers, printed in a comparison table as a warning. They are not this seller's prices.
Not for its own product. The phrase appears as a criticism of the market it compares itself against.
No list is published; the page says coverage is expanding and directs readers to check during the intake.
WellMedr is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.